Update: AB 1069 will be heard in the Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, May 13.
See bill text AB 1069
Here is some background on why this is much-needed legislation:
AB 1069 makes essential improvements over the currently ineffective monitoring of pesticide related illness.
In the fall of 2007, during aerial pesticide spraying of Monterey and Santa Cruz counties for the Light Brown Apple Moth (LBAM), the lack of an adequate means for reporting and tracking of pesticide-related illnesses was one of many negative consequences associated with that emergency insect-eradication program. Residents and visitors were unable to determine exactly when, where and how to report their reactions to the spray.
This confusion resulted in pesticide illness-reports being scattered across public and private forums, sent to a variety of local and state agencies and personnel, and documented using several different forms. The lack of a standardized reporting mechanism caused hundreds of illness reports to be dismissed as "inadequate" or "improperly filed" by various state agencies working to evaluate these illness reports. Additionally, the confusion over how to register illnesses likely led to an under-reporting of adverse human health effects.
California law requires everyone damaged by a pesticide application to file an official form with his or her local agricultural commissioner within 30 days of exposure. As a result of not being informed of this affirmative duty, hundreds of residents failed to file such forms.
AB 1069 establishes a telephone hotline staffed with public health personnel in advance of any pesticide spraying. These public health personnel are to be knowledgeable about the pesticide application, familiar with the paperwork required to register health complaints, and charged with inputting pesticide-related health complaints into a database.
This common-sense legislation will benefit the health of all Californians. Making it easier for the people of California and its agencies to monitor pesticide exposure will help document the effects of these chemicals and we hope, in time, will lead to a diminition of their use.
Send endorsement letters for the bill to Assembly Member Monning, Fax: 916-319-2127
Download sample letter
Re: Support for AB 1069 (Monning)
Dear Assemblymember Monning,
I am writing to endorse Assembly Bill 1069 (Monning). I support this bill because it makes essential improvements over the currently ineffective monitoring of pesticide related illness.
In the fall of 2007, during aerial pesticide spraying of Monterey and Santa Cruz counties for the Light Brown Apple Moth (LBAM), the lack of an adequate means for reporting and tracking of pesticide-related illnesses was one of many negative consequences associated with that emergency insect-eradication program. Residents and visitors were unable to determine exactly when, where and how to report their reactions to the spray.
This confusion resulted in pesticide illness-reports being scattered across public and private forums, sent to a variety of local and state agencies and personnel, and documented using several different forms. The lack of a standardized reporting mechanism caused hundreds of illness reports to be dismissed as "inadequate" or "improperly filed" by various state agencies working to evaluate these illness reports. Additionally, the confusion over how to register illnesses likely led to an under-reporting of adverse human health effects.
AB 1069 establishes a telephone hotline staffed with public health personnel in advance of any pesticide spraying. These public health personnel are to be knowledgeable about the pesticide application, familiar with the paperwork required to register health complaints, and charged with inputting pesticide-related health complaints into a database.
This common-sense legislation will benefit the health of all Californians. Making it easier for the people of California and its agencies to monitor pesticide exposure will help document the effects of these chemicals and we hope, in time, will lead to a diminition of their use.
Sincerely, ______________________